Rev 3(5.2)
Context:
Our team currently find a strong need for a PDB.
Simplify the wiring by a significant amount.
However, when testing the older revision of the PDB, we observed some issues with the previous iteration.
RCA:
The previous tests have indicated the root of the spark is from the current sensing side, not the actual power line. Wolfgang suggests it might caused by shorting the board. But need to redesign it due to upgraded spec.
Goal:
Further, simplify the PDB
respec the whole system based on the current spec
Unprotected:
48V 3A max
Protected
Drivetrain (Step down to 24V)
48V 20A
Arm (Step down to 24V)
A2 + A3
48V 10A
rest 48V 20A
Science (TBD)
48V 10A
Sensor (TBD)
48V 3A
The team does not have strong confidence that the customized Buck will work 100% without a doubt based on the current testing. Therefore, the current plan is to change the connector of the Buck Converter and make it interchangeable with the OFF THE SHELF solution.
Request for change:
Reduce the number of voltage-sensing and current-sensing
Voltage sensing is only implemented with High-value electronics
Current sensing is only with high load application
assume the buck does not overvoltage, or Undervoltage and lead to device failure
Include plug-in Fuse (reduce the need for current sensing)
Include rail fault detection
open HIGH LOAD Or HIGH-VALUE rail if short is detected
Include 12V rail in the current system
Include ESTOP and 48V RELAY in the system
INPUT FUSE MUST BE REPLACEABLE
Replace the screw terminal with one can take the higher gauge
User define jumper
Power via USB or power supply when programming
Enable arm system or science system
Enable current sensing for the rail(if there is a fault in current sensing, can disable the circuit and continue using PDB)
Reduce the impact of the inrush current on the ESTOP
Summary:
The current research has indicated that all our motors are best suited for 24V power, not 48V.
The focus of the new revision of PDB is to update the power side, not the controller side. Maybe it could be beneficial to support UART + CAN just as a backup. The POE Method for the router needs to be evaluated since an ethernet splitter might be beneficial.