Science Mechanism (2021-2022) Research

Science Mechanism (2021-2022) Research

URC Science Tasks

Sampling Mechanism

Scoops

Spherical Scoop

  • Optimized scoop design which can scoop more and with less resistance

  • Data and research to back it.

Percussive Scoop

Four Degree of Freedom Scoop

Vacuum/Suction + Drill

Bialystok University of Technology URC Design from 2016

How it works

  • Drill connected to a suction system attached to a descending mechanism

  • The descending mechanism lowers

  • Drill collects soil

  • The turbine  powers on and creates a pressure differential creating a region of low pressure inside the container

    • This transfers the soil into the container

    • From the looks of two in-situ tests are taking place inside the container to check for life

  • Exhaust of turbine covered by a flap to prevent contamination when idle

Pros

Cons

Tested design at URC, hence soil composition in Utah were considered

Need a mechanism to transfer soil to different location for scientific analysis

Seems Feasible to build, already done previously

Not much data on efficiency and performance

Almost no contamination

 

Collected almost 30g of soil in 30s

 

Modifications:

  • Completely redesign the mechanism or modify it so it can transfort soil to separate containers/test tubes for in-situ analysis

Pneumatic 

PlanetVac Design (Honeybee Robotics)

How it works?

  • Blow gas (pure nitrogen) into the ground and capture the soil and air mixture through the excavation nozzles to the transport tube

  • Works on the principle of differential pressure; fluid (air) moves from a region of high pressure to low pressure (excavation nozzle)

  • Use of nozzles to increase pressure (to facilitate movement) in the P-sampler head.

  • The soil-air mixture travels through the transport tube into the sampling container.

    • Air gets released into the environment through the separator in the transport tube

  • 2 Solenoid valve to control the flow rate of the gas (2 actuation points)

    • N2 at a pressure of 65 psi is used

Pros

Cons

Proven and Tested design

  • Lots of data on performance available through the research paper

Lots of sand thrown "blown" into the atmosphere. Could get on the rover and the instruments

Martian Conditions were taken into account

Need "ultra pure" nitrogen gas. Possibly expensive?

Seems contamination free

 

Seems relatively simple to modify and manufacture

 

Use relatively less power than drills/scoops.

 

Modifications:

  • Divide the transport tube into multiple tubes for testing and analysis.

  • Shorten the transport tube

  • Maybe add a mechanism to ascend and descend the mechanism

    • Does not hinder the rovers movement

    • Reduce sand going into the surroundings from the sample head

  • Use a cheaper alternative to N2 if N2 is expensive.

  • Use Dust Covers on the rover