Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Next »

Introduction

When you google "6 axis arm" (or 5) there are a lot of pictures that look like the pictures below. They look very impressive with their smooth fancy casing, however those casings add unnecessary weight. Considering the fact that the rover has a weight restriction, and that a heavier arm means we need more powerful (aka more expensive and heavier) motors on the arm to move the extra weight, we probably don't want to do too much of this. The only advantage of the case (other than looking nice) is protecting the inner workings of the arm. The arms function exactly the same without the case.

Unsurprisingly, when you look at other teams' SAR videos, they don't really look the same. One big difference is that the URC arms all have the wiring external, whereas the fancy ones have all or the vast majority of wiring hidden inside the casing.

If we're considering aesthetics, wire management is a big part of it. Looking at the rover pictures above, the majority of them would look much sleeker/nicer without the wiring (in my opinion, at least). I think that instead of focusing on making fancy casing we should focus more on wire management, and aesthetics will come with that.

Anyway, that was a bit off topic, here are some common linkage types ("bone structures").

Common Linkage Designs

DescriptionNotesExample
Thin frame on either side
  • Two thin pieces of material on either side of the segment (with nothing, just empty air/necessary supports, in between), just enough to connect to the actuator/previous segment and support the rest of the arm
  • Actuators and the next segment are located between the two frame pieces, making it symmetrical
  • Nowhere to hide wires or power transmission parts at all
  • Would be with a strong, lightweight material, but (I assume) would make for a very flimsy arm otherwise
  • Seems to be used more on lower segments, my assumption is that it would be harder to implement well higher up when you have more parts closer together
  • Actuator and everything contained in the joint module

Wider frame on either side (with lightening holes where possible/necessary)
  • I feel like this is just different enough from above to separate it
  • Similar to above with the symmetrical frame, empty center, etc
  • Wider frame is used to support motors, gears, etc instead of strictly being a link from one segment to the other
  • Seems more commonly used throughout the entire arm (as opposed to just the lower segments) than above
  • Provides more mounting points/opportunities to hide/manage wires than the thinner option
  • Also provides real estate for sponsor panels




  • No labels