Green Buildings
Table of Contents
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Aspects
- 3 Building Process
- 4 Impacts
- 4.1 Environmental
- 4.2 Economic
- 4.3 Social
- 4.4 Ethical
- 5 Rating Systems
- 6 Precedents
- 7 Additional Reading
- 7.1 Data bases
- 8 References
- 8.1 Contributors:
Green Building [1] |
|---|
Introduction to Green Buildings [2] |
|---|
Introduction
Green buildings refer to buildings that reduce negative impacts on the natural environment and climate while raising the quality of life [4]. This takes into consideration the building’s lifetime which consists of the site, design, construction, operation, maintenance, renovation, and demolition. The entire process must be approached in a way that is sustainable and can be classified as a high-performance building. Any building can be green if it meets the requirements of the target rating system that will assess various pre-determined factors of the building. LEED, Living Building Challenge, and BuildGreen are all examples of such systems that rate the sustainability of a building [3].
Features of Sustainability of Green Buildings [3] |
|---|
Aspects
The overarching idea of a green building is its comparatively smaller negative impact on its surroundings than other construction projects of a similar nature [5]. There are a few definitive features that classify buildings as green which include efficient water, energy, and resource use, renewable energy systems like installing solar panels, reducing pollution and the amount of waste disposal by adhering to recycling and reuse. In terms of raising the quality of life for the building's users, the standard of indoor air must be high and materials utilized should be non-toxic, ethical, and sustainable. Another important attribute of a supportable design lies in its ability of adapting to both temporary or permanent environmental changes.
Building Process
Prior to the planning phase of a green building, there are many factors that have to be considered and even more details that must be integrated during the design, construction, and even demolition of the structure to ensure the many demands are met. Since a building is not a solitary establishment, relationships with the site, interactions with its users, and the everchanging Earth prove to be major problems that are addressed by green buildings.
Green Construction [8] |
|---|
Energy
Conserve energy throughout entire building cycle [7]
Lower energy when building is in use including occupant usage
Renewable or low-carbon energy sources for needs
Ensure building has already achieved maximum natural efficiency
Water Sources
Minimize water use in buildings by improving ways to manage drinking and waste water [7]
Use innovative ways to access water within a building
Keep in mind the influence on surrounding storm water and drainage systems
Waste and Reuse
Use materials high in durability and generally less materials to create less waste [7]
Consider how to recycle the building at the end of its lifetime
Ensure people within building acknowledge recycle and reuse protocols for waste
Health and Wellbeing
Good ventilation that brings quality air from outdoors inside [7]
Do not use materials that are toxic or harmful
Green Environment
Preserve nature and wildlife, either creating new green spaces or turning polluted land into useable space [7]
Utilize empty spaces for agriculture
Resilience and Flexibility
Able to withstand abrupt changes and natural hazards such as earthquakes, floods, or fires [7]
Keeps inhabitants safe
Predicts progress over time so the building will not be disqualified in a short amount of time
Community and People Connections
Connects people in a societal or economic manner and is against all discretion [7]
Good flow of traffic and accessibility, encourage walking or cycling
Find ways to contact surrounding world that are more “smart” such as advanced electricity grids to distribute energy
Life Cycle
Resourceful and efficient through all stages (design, construction, operation and maintenance, renovation, and demolition) [7]
Transport and production of materials within scope of building are reduced
Impacts
For engineers, it is beyond crucial to consider the impacts of actions on various aspects of the world. When designing or creating green buildings, engineers should keep in mind the environmental, economic, social, and ethical changes that choosing to build a green building will bring and weigh the pros and cons to make the best decision.
Environmental
On an environmental level, green buildings are able to offer great benefits. When planned appropriately, the structure can, not only conserve resources or reduce negative impact, but can also produce positive outcomes through processes such as energy generation and promoting biodiversity.
Globally
Buildings
Natural Habitat [10] |
|---|
Economic
In terms of economics in a multilevel society, green buildings can impact all types of people and groups. Examples of where finance can be improved vary due to a persons’ role. For tenants and the average household, utility bills for houses are lower due to more efficient energy and water suppliers. In the case of building developers, there are usually less payments regarding construction and increase in property value. Owners of buildings, they benefit from higher occupancy probability or costs for operation. Finally, overall there are more job opportunities as a result. There is a link between economics and green buildings that can be developed further [6].
Globally
Country
Building
Economics of Green Buildings [16] |
|---|
Social
Socially, green buildings also play a role, mostly revolving around benefits in terms of health and well-being for those who utilize green buildings, as work space or housing [6].
Features of a Green Building [18] |
|---|
Ethical
Although building green is definitely a move in the right direction for less harmful impacts, subsequently there are some concerns addressing the morality of this type of construction. Sometimes, the push to become better is also shadowed by unethical and dishonest practices; more than what is seen on the surface.
Ethics and the Environment [20] |
|---|
Rating Systems
International
LEED Logo [21] |
|---|
LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design)
Run by the Green Building Council in the U.S. and verified either on-site or by a third-party [21]
Four levels: certified, silver, gold, and platinum, in ascending order of certification
Nine main considerations: location/transportation, site choice, efficient water sources, overall energy and consideration of the atmosphere, material/resources, quality indoors, innovation, prioritization in the area, and integrative processes
WELL Logo [21] |
|---|
WELL
Under the IWBI (International WELL Building Institute) [21]
Strongly considers user health and wellness and looks at 11 areas: air quality, water quality, nutrition, light, flow, heat, sound, materials, mental awareness, connections with society, and innovation.
Has prerequisites and standards for buildings before registration
Fitwel Logo [21] |
|---|
Fitwel
Mainly directed to increase quality of life of occupants in the building as well as the society it is integrated within [21]
No prerequisites to obtain green certification
Aspects most focused on: location, accessibility, surrounding areas, entryways, stairs, indoor environment, workspaces, common areas, water quality, cafeterias/kitchens, vending machines/snack bars, and emergency procedures
Canada
BOMA BEST Logo [23] |
|---|
BOMA BEST
Created by BOMA (Building Owners and Managers Association) [22]
Uses the environmental assessment platform by Green Globes
Ten interests: energy sources, water quality, air quality, comfort level, health/wellness, custodial, purchasing, waste, site/stakeholder engagement
BuiltGreen Logo [24] |
|---|
BuiltGreen
Program for certifying residential buildings across Canada [22]
A program called built-communities is currently underway
Assesses: energy, envelope, materials, construction methods, indoor air quality, ventilation, waste management, and water and building practices
Living Building Challenge Logo [25] |
|---|
Living Building Challenge
Divided into four parts equally: philosophy, advocacy, and certification [22]
Has an approach to answer to various factors in comparison to fulfilling a checklist
Seven specifics are: location, water, energy, health/mental wellness, materials, equity and aesthetics
OAA Logo [28] |
|---|
Ontario Association of Architects (OAA)
Provides information regarding sustainability matters [27]
Covers both philosophical and technical ideas
Uses case studies to showcase different green buildings
Has goal of pursuing climate stability for the built environment
Precedents
Pixel Building [26] |
|---|
Pixel Building [26]
Type: Office Building
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Designed by: Decibel Architecture
Date Completed: 2010
Features:
first workplace building in Australia that can be classified as carbon-neutral
brightly colored panels that utilize natural sunlight and shade
multi-use supports of the building to also get rid of wastewater
numerous wind turbines
Museum of Tomorrow [26] |
|---|
Museum of Tomorrow [26]
Type: Museum
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Designed by: Santiago Calatrava
Date Completed: 2015
Features:
building components include cantilevered roof, reflective pools, skeletal structure
solar panels that are like fins and also adjustable
water system that carries water from Guanabara Bay that is used for air conditioning
Vancouver Convention Centre West [26] |
|---|
Vancouver Convention Centre West [26]
Type: Events
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Designed by: LMN Architects
Date Completed: 2009
Features:
first building of its kind to obtain double LEED platinum
Plants and grasses on roof are pollinated by four hives of European bees for constant temperature
roof is sloped for drainage
part of building is on top of water that helps marine animals
ACROS Fukuoka Prefectural International Hall [26] |
|---|
ACROS Fukuoka Prefectural International Hall [26]
Type: Multi-use
Location: Fukuoka, Japan
Designed by: Emilio Ambasz and Associates
Date Completed: 1995
Features:
15 garden terraces that rise over 197 feet
embodiment of public green space
utilization of plants retains indoor temperature and supports wildlife and insects
The Edge [26] |
|---|
The Edge [26]
Type: Office building
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Designed by: PLP Architecture
Date Completed: 2014
Features:
saves over 80% of energy for lighting by using a digital ceiling and sensors
façade is composed of solar panels
controls temperature by water
rated 98.3% for sustainability according to BRREAM
Additional Reading
Data bases
Passive house: https://passivehouse.com/
Passive house (Canada): https://www.passivehousecanada.com/
SABmag: https://sabmagazine.com/
CAGBC: https://www.cagbc.org/
U.S. Green Building Council: https://www.usgbc.org/
Contributors: