...
How would these systems work? DHT 22 and CO2 sensors both have a shroud which covers the sensors as they are lowered into the soil. The soil moisture sensor is simple simply lowered into the ground.
What are the risks associated with each individual design concept? Design concept 1 takes up more space and weighs more and is more complicated. It also has more complex geometry meaning that it will be harder to 3D print.
Design concept 2 has a center of mass that is farther from the mount platform meaning that it is more likely to deform. Depending on the length of the mounting bolts the platform is more likely to be damaged upon pluging into the soil.Design Proposal
What design concept do you want to move forward with? I want to move forward with Design Concept 2
Justify this decision by completing the following:
How could this design compare to established criteria and constraints? The design is not so large that it would make rotating the dinolite camera a problem. It woul would allow the sensors to successfully collect their data. It meets all the constraints.
Is there risk associated with achieving any requirements? The moisture sensor is positioned a little lower than the other sensors which is not ideal. The final design would aim to have them all located at similar heights.How are identified design risks planned to be mitigated? To prevent the platform from deforming after plunging into the soil, several long bolts will connect it to the P0233. It will also use a number of ribs to prevent it from bending and snapping.
Very quick thoughts on what resources you may need to build and fabricate your design. The design will be 3D printed. It will require a few bolts to affix it to P0233, and to affix the sensors to the platform.
What is your proposed project timeline?
Propose a CDR date - Nov 27th